Dan Wells Dan Wells's Profile Page

Dan Wells Dan Wells

About me

Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate資料勉強 & Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate模擬試験

2025年CertShikenの最新Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate PDFダンプおよびDatabricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate試験エンジンの無料共有：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1wN8pH9vDtdlCCNajonEYby-zvJG-6VDH

CertShikenはDatabricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate認定試験に対する短期で有効な訓練を提供するウェブサイト、Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate認定試験が生活の変化をもたらすテストでございます。合格書を持ち方が持たない人により高い給料をもうけられます。

Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate 認定試験の出題範囲：

トピック
出題範囲

トピック 1

Assembling and Deploying Applications: In this topic, Generative AI Engineers get knowledge about coding a chain using a pyfunc mode, coding a simple chain using langchain, and coding a simple chain according to requirements. Additionally, the topic focuses on basic elements needed to create a RAG application. Lastly, the topic addresses sub-topics about registering the model to Unity Catalog using MLflow.

トピック 2

Application Development: In this topic, Generative AI Engineers learn about tools needed to extract data, Langchain
similar tools, and assessing responses to identify common issues. Moreover, the topic includes questions about adjusting an LLM's response, LLM guardrails, and the best LLM based on the attributes of the application.

トピック 3

Governance: Generative AI Engineers who take the exam get knowledge about masking techniques, guardrail techniques, and legal
licensing requirements in this topic.

>> Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate資料勉強 <<

Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate試験の準備方法｜有難いDatabricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate資料勉強試験｜権威のあるDatabricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate模擬試験

Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate問題集は一年間で無料更新サービスを提供することができ、Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate認定試験の合格に大変役に立ちます。そして、もしDatabricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate問題集の更新版があれば、お客様にお送りいたします。Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate問題集は全面的かつわかりやすいです。あなたはDatabricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate問題集をちゃんと覚えると、Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate試験に合格することは簡単です。では、試験を心配するより、今から行動しましょう。

Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate 認定 Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate 試験問題 (Q55-Q60):

質問 # 55
A Generative AI Engineer is building a RAG application that will rely on context retrieved from source documents that are currently in PDF format. These PDFs can contain both text and images. They want to develop a solution using the least amount of lines of code.
Which Python package should be used to extract the text from the source documents?

A. unstructured
B. flask
C. beautifulsoup
D. numpy

正解：C

解説：
* Problem Context: The engineer needs to extract text from PDF documents, which may contain both text and images. The goal is to find a Python package that simplifies this task using the least amount of code.
* Explanation of Options:
* Option A: flask: Flask is a web framework for Python, not suitable for processing or extracting content from PDFs.
* Option B: beautifulsoup: Beautiful Soup is designed for parsing HTML and XML documents, not PDFs.
* Option C: unstructured: This Python package is specifically designed to work with unstructured data, including extracting text from PDFs. It provides functionalities to handle various types of content in documents with minimal coding, making it ideal for the task.
* Option D: numpy: Numpy is a powerful library for numerical computing in Python and does not provide any tools for text extraction from PDFs.
Given the requirement,Option C(unstructured) is the most appropriate as it directly addresses the need to efficiently extract text from PDF documents with minimal code.

質問 # 56
A Generative Al Engineer is building a system which will answer questions on latest stock news articles.
Which will NOT help with ensuring the outputs are relevant to financial news?

A. Incorporate manual reviews to correct any problematic outputs prior to sending to the users
B. Implement a comprehensive guardrail framework that includes policies for content filters tailored to the finance sector.
C. Increase the compute to improve processing speed of questions to allow greater relevancy analysis C Implement a profanity filter to screen out offensive language

正解：C

解説：
In the context of ensuring that outputs are relevant to financial news, increasing compute power (option B) does not directly improve therelevanceof the LLM-generated outputs. Here's why:
* Compute Power and Relevancy:Increasing compute power can help the model process inputs faster, but it does not inherentlyimprove therelevanceof the answers. Relevancy depends on the data sources, the retrieval method, and the filtering mechanisms in place, not on how quickly the model processes the query.
* What Actually Helps with Relevance:Other methods, like content filtering, guardrails, or manual review, can directly impact the relevance of the model's responses by ensuring the model focuses on pertinent financial content. These methods help tailor the LLM's responses to the financial domain and avoid irrelevant or harmful outputs.
* Why Other Options Are More Relevant:
* A (Comprehensive Guardrail Framework): This will ensure that the model avoids generating content that is irrelevant or inappropriate in the finance sector.
* C (Profanity Filter): While not directly related to financial relevancy, ensuring the output is clean and professional is still important in maintaining the quality of responses.
* D (Manual Review): Incorporating human oversight to catch and correct issues with the LLM's output ensures the final answers are aligned with financial content expectations.
Thus, increasing compute power does not help with ensuring the outputs are more relevant to financial news, making option B the correct answer.

質問 # 57
A Generative AI Engineer is tasked with deploying an application that takes advantage of a custom MLflow Pyfunc model to return some interim results.
How should they configure the endpoint to pass the secrets and credentials?

A. Add credentials using environment variables
B. Pass the secrets in plain text
C. Pass variables using the Databricks Feature Store API
D. Use spark.conf.set ()

正解：A

解説：
Context: Deploying an application that uses an MLflow Pyfunc model involves managing sensitive information such as secrets and credentials securely.
Explanation of Options:
* Option A: Use spark.conf.set(): While this method can pass configurations within Spark jobs, using it for secrets is not recommended because it may expose them in logs or Spark UI.
* Option B: Pass variables using the Databricks Feature Store API: The Feature Store API is designed for managing features for machine learning, not for handling secrets or credentials.
* Option C: Add credentials using environment variables: This is a common practice for managing credentials in a secure manner, as environment variables can be accessed securely by applications without exposing them in the codebase.
* Option D: Pass the secrets in plain text: This is highly insecure and not recommended, as it exposes sensitive information directly in the code.
Therefore,Option Cis the best method for securely passing secrets and credentials to an application, protecting them from exposure.

質問 # 58
A Generative Al Engineer is building a production-ready LLM system which replies directly to customers.
The solution makes use of the Foundation Model API via provisioned throughput. They are concerned that the LLM could potentially respond in a toxic or otherwise unsafe way. They also wish to perform this with the least amount of effort.
Which approach will do this?

A. Add a regex expression on inputs and outputs to detect unsafe responses.
B. Add some LLM calls to their chain to detect unsafe content before returning text
C. Ask users to report unsafe responses
D. Host Llama Guard on Foundation Model API and use it to detect unsafe responses

正解：D

解説：
The task is to prevent toxic or unsafe responses in an LLM system using the Foundation Model API with minimal effort. Let's assess the options.
* Option A: Host Llama Guard on Foundation Model API and use it to detect unsafe responses
* Llama Guard is a safety-focused model designed to detect toxic or unsafe content. Hosting it via the Foundation Model API (a Databricks service) integrates seamlessly with the existing system, requiring minimal setup (just deployment and a check step), and leverages provisioned throughput for performance.
* Databricks Reference:"Foundation Model API supports hosting safety models like Llama Guard to filter outputs efficiently"("Foundation Model API Documentation," 2023).
* Option B: Add some LLM calls to their chain to detect unsafe content before returning text
* Using additional LLM calls (e.g., prompting an LLM to classify toxicity) increases latency, complexity, and effort (crafting prompts, chaining logic), and lacks the specificity of a dedicated safety model.
* Databricks Reference:"Ad-hoc LLM checks are less efficient than purpose-built safety solutions" ("Building LLM Applications with Databricks").
* Option C: Add a regex expression on inputs and outputs to detect unsafe responses
* Regex can catch simple patterns (e.g., profanity) but fails for nuanced toxicity (e.g., sarcasm, context-dependent harm), requiring significant manual effort to maintain and update rules.
* Databricks Reference:"Regex-based filtering is limited for complex safety needs"("Generative AI Cookbook").
* Option D: Ask users to report unsafe responses
* User reporting is reactive, not preventive, and places burden on users rather than the system. It doesn't limit unsafe outputs proactively and requires additional effort for feedback handling.
* Databricks Reference:"Proactive guardrails are preferred over user-driven monitoring" ("Databricks Generative AI Engineer Guide").
Conclusion: Option A (Llama Guard on Foundation Model API) is the least-effort, most effective approach, leveraging Databricks' infrastructure for seamless safety integration.

質問 # 59
Generative AI Engineer at an electronics company just deployed a RAG application for customers to ask questions about products that the company carries. However, they received feedback that the RAG response often returns information about an irrelevant product.
What can the engineer do to improve the relevance of the RAG's response?

A. Assess the quality of the retrieved context
B. Use a different LLM to improve the generated response
C. Use a different semantic similarity search algorithm
D. Implement caching for frequently asked questions

正解：A

解説：
In a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) system, the key to providing relevant responses lies in the quality of the retrieved context. Here's why option A is the most appropriate solution:
* Context Relevance:The RAG model generates answers based on retrieved documents or context. If the retrieved information is about an irrelevant product, it suggests that the retrieval step is failing to select the right context. The Generative AI Engineer must first assess the quality of what is being retrieved and ensure it is pertinent to the query.
* Vector Search and Embedding Similarity:RAG typically uses vector search for retrieval, where embeddings of the query are matched against embeddings of product descriptions. Assessing the semantic similarity searchprocess ensures that the closest matches are actually relevant to the query.
* Fine-tuning the Retrieval Process:By improving theretrieval quality, such as tuning the embeddings or adjusting the retrieval strategy, the system can return more accurate and relevant product information.
* Why Other Options Are Less Suitable:
* B (Caching FAQs): Caching can speed up responses for frequently asked questions but won't improve the relevance of the retrieved content for less frequent or new queries.
* C (Use a Different LLM): Changing the LLM only affects the generation step, not the retrieval process, which is the core issue here.
* D (Different Semantic Search Algorithm): This could help, but the first step is to evaluate the current retrieval context before replacing the search algorithm.
Therefore, improving and assessing the quality of the retrieved context (option A) is the first step to fixing the issue of irrelevant product information.

質問 # 60
......

ブラウジング中の支払いのセキュリティが心配ですか？ Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associateテストトレントは、購入プロセスのセキュリティ、製品のダウンロード、インストールを安全でウイルスのないものにすることができます。この点について疑問がある場合は、専門の担当者がインストールと使用をリモートでガイドします。 Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associateテスト回答の購入プロセスは非常に簡単で、単純な人にとっては大きな恩恵です。Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate学習教材の合格率は彼らのものよりもはるかに高いことを保証できます。そしてこれが最も重要です。以前のデータによると、Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associateトレーニング質問を使用する人の98％〜99％が試験に合格しました。あなたが私たちに信頼を与えてくれるなら、私たちはあなたに成功を与えます。

Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate模擬試験: https://www.certshiken.com/Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate-shiken.html

P.S.CertShikenがGoogle Driveで共有している無料の2025 Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associateダンプ：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1wN8pH9vDtdlCCNajonEYby-zvJG-6VDH

0

Tutorial Enrolled

0

Tutorial Completed

Dan Wells Dan Wells

About me

0

0

Sign in